Slide 1

[Audio] There once was a notorious couple who posed as builders, known for their dubious reputation and shady dealings. Their company, PJ's Building Developments, was infamous for leaving clients high and dry, with unfinished projects and unpaid debts. But little did anyone know, this was only the tip of the iceberg. Behind the scenes, the couple was embroiled in a web of deceit and corruption, with secrets waiting to be uncovered. Let me take you on a journey through the twisted tale of Margaret Justin and Curtis Poleon, a duo whose exploits would leave even the most seasoned professionals stunned..

[Audio] Margaret Justin and Curtis Poleon were a crooked couple who posed as builders. They operated under the banner of PJ's building developments. In March 2010, they abandoned a job on Saffron Hill. Their clients then sought revenge against them. The duo had a history of taking money from clients and disappearing. They hid under cover for two years on Saffron Hill. Curtis claimed that it wasn't him who committed the crimes..

[Audio] Curtis had moved on from his previous activities, taking up a new venture in drug smuggling. He found it to be a faster way to earn money compared to finding and defrauding clients through building contracts. However, his new endeavour came to an abrupt end when he was arrested in Barbados. His statement, "If you're not smart enough to build you're not gonna be smart enough to deal!" suggests that he believed his skills in one area could translate to another, but ultimately proved himself wrong..

[Audio] Margaret Justin's defense strategy has been characterized by repeated claims of ignorance regarding the legal proceedings against her. She disputes orders for possession and sale of her property despite the passage of three years. Her excuses have included blaming the postman and thieves in her building for intercepting her mail. In a bizarre twist, she has cited the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights, mixing British and American law. She also brought a self-proclaimed 'bully' into the courtroom, prompting the judge to intervene and silence him. This behavior has raised questions about her mental fitness and led some to suggest that she may indeed belong in a psychiatric institution..

[Audio] The judge finally makes a decision after years of litigation. He declares that Margaret's claim is totally without merit. This means that she has no valid reason for disputing the orders made against her. With this ruling, all her previous attempts to delay the process come to an end. The judge's verdict marks the beginning of the end of Margaret's long and complicated journey through the courts..

[Audio] The police's efforts to remove Maggs peacefully failed because she continued to resist despite being given numerous opportunities to vacate the premises. In a last-ditch attempt to regain control of the property, she broke back in, but this time she was met with a more robust response from the authorities. A full team, including backup, was present, allowing the police to successfully evict her once and for all. To prevent any further unauthorized access, a locksmith was called in to secure the property..

[Audio] Maggs continues her life of crime and terrorizes the buyers and their solicitors who choose to purchase the property notwithstanding..

[Audio] The judgement debt has been accruing at an impressive rate of eight percent per annum. As a result, the original amount owed has been more than quadrupled by the additional costs incurred over this period. This includes not only the interest but also the substantial fees associated with the numerous court appearances and bailiff visits. With the funds now safely deposited into our account, we can reflect on the journey that brought us here..

[Audio] The defendant, Margaret Justin, has delayed another hearing for aggravated trespassing. She claims not to have been aware of the charges. A new hearing is set for December 5th. Attorneys will attend..

[Audio] Margaret Maggs, the defendant, has been involved in numerous court hearings since May 2010. On May 14th, she lodged particulars of claim at the London Central County Court. Various judges have issued orders against her, including HH District Judge Millard, who passed away during the proceedings. Despite these orders, Maggs continued to dispute them, citing reasons such as being unaware of the proceedings due to issues with mail delivery. In August 2013, HH Circuit Judge Mitchell dismissed her application to appeal, and in October of the same year, he ordered possession to proceed. By January 2014, Maggs' appeals had been exhausted, and the warrant for possession was set to take place on January 24th..

[Audio] The Judge questions Margaret Justin's claims of limited involvement in PJ's Building Developments. She states that the initials "PJ" stand for "Property Joiners", but this contradicts the available evidence. Written records show frequent communication between Justin and the claimants, Erwan Raven and Elanzo Burgess. Investigation reveals that Justin actively participated in business activities, such as requesting payments and overseeing construction projects, indicating that she presented herself as a partner in the company. This behavior makes her and Curtis Poleon jointly and severally responsible for any liabilities..

[Audio] In a land far, far away, a peculiar case unfolded in a place where the law was meant to be upheld. A barrister stood before a judge, seeking to determine whether papers had been served three years prior, a crucial aspect of the appeal. The judge expressed confusion, unable to locate the official court documents confirming service. The barrister requested permission to inspect the judge's bundle, citing an irregularity, yet willing to expedite the process. The judge agreed, under supervision, allowing the barrister to review the documents quickly. After a thorough search, the barrister discovered a file bearing a court stamp, indicating that the papers had indeed been served twice, as evidenced by the official court office stamp. The judge, now convinced, declared that Miss Justin had been correctly served in March 2010. This pivotal moment could have led to a fresh start in the court proceedings, had the stamp not been found..

[Audio] Margaret Justin, known to many as Miss Justin, was a builder who had built a reputation for herself in the industry. However, things took a turn when she found herself in a series of court battles over a property development project called PJ's. The project was marred by controversy, and Miss Justin's involvement in it raised many questions about her integrity and honesty. As the court hearings progressed, it became clear that Miss Justin was not telling the truth about her involvement in the project. She claimed that she was not involved, but evidence suggested otherwise. Despite this, she continued to defend herself in court, often using tactics that were questionable at best. One of her most notable tactics was her use of a McKenzie friend, a person who assists litigants in court, but in this case, the McKenzie friend seemed more interested in chatting with Miss Justin than in providing actual assistance. The judge grew increasingly frustrated with Miss Justin's antics, particularly when she began to use legal jargon in an aggressive tone. At one point, the judge warned her that if she continued to make frivolous claims, she could face a limited civil restraining order, which would limit her ability to make further claims across the UK. The judge's warning was a stark reminder of the consequences of Miss Justin's actions, and it marked a turning point in the court battle..

[Audio] We would like to extend our gratitude to those who have supported us throughout this challenging journey. Our Consultant Solicitor, Alexander Zivancevic, worked tirelessly alongside us, guiding us through the complexities of the law and ensuring that justice was served. His dedication and expertise were invaluable, and we appreciate the numerous evictions he assisted us with, as well as the logistical arrangements he made to secure the necessary personnel, including policemen, locksmiths, and barristers. His extensive work on the case has resulted in a substantial collection of files, a testament to his commitment. We also want to express our appreciation to our team of Barristers, particularly Marc Brittain, who demonstrated remarkable skill in uncovering crucial evidence within the Judge's bundle. His successful defence of the appeals was instrumental in achieving a favourable outcome. Additionally, Helen Turnbull's meticulous reading of the financial records during the trial was instrumental in establishing the facts of the case. Furthermore, we acknowledge the efforts of the Clerkenwell and Shoreditch county court officers, district Judges, and Circuit Judges, who diligently reviewed the evidence and delivered their verdict. Their thoroughness and attention to detail were essential in reaching a just decision. We are especially grateful to HH Judge Cryan, who devoted four hours to carefully examining the evidence before rendering his judgement. His final ruling brought closure to this lengthy process. In conclusion, we would like to extend our sincerest thanks to everyone involved in this case, whose tireless efforts and unwavering commitment to justice have made a significant difference in our lives..