Name: L a t I n m a x I m s
Uploaded: 2022-09-12
Duration: 4 min 5 s
Description: L a t I n m a x I m s. On the principle that IGNORANCE OF LAW EXCUSES NO ONE BUT IGNORANCE OF FACT MAY BE AN EXCUSE.

L a t I n m a x I m s. On the principle that IGNORANCE OF LAW EXCUSES NO ONE BUT IGNORANCE OF FACT MAY BE AN EXCUSE. 

Scene 1

On the principle that IGNORANCE OF LAW EXCUSES NO ONE BUT IGNORANCE OF FACT MAY BE AN EXCUSE

Ignorance of law excuses no one. “Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat”. 

Scene 2

IGNORANCE OR MISTAKE IN POINT OF FACT IS AN EXCUSE

APPLIES TO ALL KINDS OF DOMESTIC LAWS. CIVIL - PENAL | SUBSTANTIVE - REMEDIAL. 

Scene 3

CIVIL        -         PENAL     	|   	SUBSTANTIVE      -   	REMEDIAL

(Gonzales v. Gonzales, 58 Phil. 67; U.S. v. Allan, 2 Phil. 630)

“Tuvera v. Tanada – effective upon published ”

APPLIES TO ALL KINDS OF     DOMESTIC LAWS

RELATIONS                                                       CRIME                                                                  RIGHTS                                                                       PROCEDURAL

L a t I n m a x I m s. On the principle that when the law does not distinguish , we should not distinguish. 

Scene 4

On the principle that when the law does not distinguish , we should not distinguish

“Ubi Lex Non Distinguit Nec Nos Distiguere Debemos”. 

Scene 5

Where the law does not distinguish, we should not distinguish

“Ubi Lex Non Distinguit Nec Nos Distiguere Debemos”

C O N S T I T U T I O N A L G A U R A N T E E O F D U E P R O C E S S to every FILIPINO. 

Scene 6

Regardless of belief or political persuasion

“NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, NOR SHALL ANY PERSON BE DENIED THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS”

COHMffTED TAG CAME,
m kNR, BUT THB
PLEAD?
nnp

C O N S T I T U T I O N A L    G A U R A N T E E    O F    D U E   P R O C E S S  to every FILIPINO

L a t I n m a x I m s

Scene 1 (0s)

Scene 2 (17s)

Scene 3 (46s)

Scene 4 (2m 47s)

Scene 5 (3m 3s)

Scene 6 (3m 19s)