Critical Evaluation of CSR, Ethical, Social and Environmental(ESE) Practice in Care Homes and Hospices

Published on Slideshow
Static slideshow
Download PDF version
Download PDF version
Embed video
Share video
Ask about this video

Scene 1 (0s)

[Audio] Critical Evaluation of CSR, Ethical, Social and Environmental(ESE) Practice in Care Homes and Hospices Students Name Instructors Details Institution Course Date.

Scene 2 (13s)

[Audio] Introduction Care homes and hospices require Good ESE to run better ((Sands Dalen, 2016). Aim: Critically analyze CSR/ESE in care homes & hospices Evaluate strengths & weaknesses Discuss impact of environmental standards Provide recommendations This presentation aims to give an in-depth look at the ethical, social, and environmental (ESE) practices and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in UK hospices and care homes. Our main goals are to look at the pros and cons of current ESE programs in this area, talk about how environmental management approval standards affect things, and suggest how to improve sustainable and moral business practices. Care homes and hospices are leaders in providing person-centered, respectful care. Still, they can't fully implement ESE principles across their operations because they don't have the money or resources. Environmental standards try to improve cultures, but they are still focused on compliance and have a small reach (Sands Dalen, 2016). We need a strategy that works for everyone and encourages moral behavior at the individual, organizational, and sector levels. This talk combines original and secondary research to give a fair critique and helpful, evidence-based suggestions on how care homes can become ethical, long-lasting business leaders. The conclusion summarises the most important findings from the analysis to show how vital ESE strategy and culture are for making a lasting positive effect..

Scene 3 (1m 55s)

[Audio] Strengths of ESE Practices Person-centered model of care prioritizes dignity and autonomy Community engagement tackles isolation Holistic approach addresses medical, emotional, spiritual need Volunteering reduces isolation Promotes social inclusion (Dennis et al., 2014). End-of-life care guidance Strengths of ESE Practices One of the best things about ESE in UK hospices and care homes is that it focuses on the person and supports their autonomy, identity, and dignity. Keeping relationships, traditions, and personal choices alive and letting people express themselves are all things this subsector does that align with ethical principles of empowerment and show that they are committed to keeping quality of life. Volunteering and other forms of community involvement also help people feel less alone and isolated while also bringing people together. Care homes often become critical places that make local care networks stronger. A philosophy that goes beyond physical health to help people find meaning, comfort, and closure as they get closer to the end of their lives is reflected in the focus on holistic well-being, which includes medical, social, psychological, and spiritual support. This desire to make sure a peaceful shift is shown by professional help with everything from managing pain to grief counseling. These many-faceted strengths show how ESE values are woven into the care beliefs that shape everyday operations (Dennis et al., 2014)..

Scene 4 (3m 41s)

[Audio] Weaknesses of ESE Practices Limited budgets hinder comprehensive ESE programs Restrict staff training opportunities Safe disposal of medical waste is challenging(Preshaw et al., 2016). Emotionally demanding work causes staff burnout Weaknesses of ESE Practices However, essential problems still make it hard to put ESE ideas into practice fully. Smaller care facilities have difficulty engaging in extensive CSR programs, staff training and qualifications, community projects, and improvements that are better for the environment because they don't have the money, resources, or space to do so. Because of rising costs, practices often need to be streamlined. This creates a dilemma between the depth of ESE efforts and keeping costs down. Care facilities and specialized garbage contractors are still responsible for safely handling and adequately removing medical waste, expired medications, and dangerous materials. This makes things more challenging to organize. Lack of formalized ways to make sustainable waste management more open shows an area that needs more oversight and closed-loop responsibility (Preshaw et al., 2016). Lastly, the emotionally demanding nature of the job can lead to burnout and poor judgment, which affects the safety and well-being of residents. This shows the need for mental health support and reflective ESE training focusing on resilience..

Scene 5 (5m 14s)

[Audio] Environmental Standards Impact Positive Impacts: Reduces environmental footprint (energy, water) Cost savings through efficiency Attracts conscious investors and staff Limitations: Focus on minimum compliance vs excellence Small facilities - expensive to implement Scope limited to environmental issues (Zadeh et al., 2018). Environmental Standards Impact Fortunately, environmental certification programs like ISO 14001 have led to several sustainability benefits for participating care facilities. These include measured drops in energy use, water use, waste volume, and cost savings. As people and investors become more aware of climate change, establishing yourself as an ethical business that wants to reduce its environmental impact can also pay off through patient choice and partnerships. However, these programs have problems because they focus on ensuring people follow the bare minimum, which doesn't encourage people to keep improving their environmental performance to the highest levels possible. Applying for, internally auditing, and maintaining registration status comes with a lot of paperwork that takes time and costs money for smaller companies. The most important thing about this is that it only looks at environmental issues. If we only follow the rules as a substitute for full responsibility, we miss out on the social and moral parts of a well-rounded ESE plan (Zadeh et al., 2018)..

Scene 6 (6m 54s)

[Audio] Recommendations Integrate ESE into organizational culture Invest in ethical training for all staff Publicly report on social and ethical initiatives Partner with stakeholders to develop solutions Implement holistic CSR/ESE strategy (Rigby & O'Connor,2012). Recommendations Four leading suggestions come out of these studies. First, care facilities need to ensure that multidimensional ESE issues are considered in their official policies, procedures, operating models, and staff training. This will help make ethical, socially aware behavior a part of the organization's culture and decisions. Second, more money should be put into structured training plans for all employees. These programs should give people the frameworks, resources, and skills they need to deal with difficult situations that involve ethics, dignity, and sustainability. This would help people improve their individual and group skills. Third, letting people freely share sustainability reports that include social metrics and ethical accountability mechanisms would clarify things and help people have a productive conversation about improving ESE performance (Rigby & O'Connor,2012).Fourth, actively making relationships in different areas, such as the private sector, the government, academia, and technology, can help people with different skills solve systemic ESE problems that need teamwork. Lastly, creating new strategic plans to improve and broaden present ESE programmes will lay the groundwork for a huge shift in how the next level of care can show ethics in everyday life..

Scene 7 (8m 35s)

[Audio] Conclusion Person-centered care respects dignity but resource limitations persist Environmental standards promote sustainability culture without driving excellence ESE integration in policies and training is crucial Partnerships enable collaboration and sharing best practices Holistic ESE strategies linking social, ethical and environmental goals are key Conclusion In conclusion, this presentation has thoroughly analyzed current ESE practices in UK care homes and hospices to find strengths such as empowering individuals and promoting person-centered choice. However, it also tempers optimism by pointing out persistent resource problems that limit the reach and size of ESE initiatives. Also, relying too much on environmental standards can lead to a culture of compliance that only meets the bare minimum instead of pushing for constant growth. Getting to an actual state of sustainable business success requires putting ESE principles at the center of all operations' decision-making and culture. This can be done through unified policies, thorough training, and planning with everyone's input. Progress also depends on using networks through partnerships and open lines of communication, which can increase the number of people working together to solve problems that are too big for one institution to handle alone. With a coordinated plan based on ethics and supported by group action, the care sector has vast untapped potential to improve significantly the health and well-being of society and the environment for both present and future generations. The next step is to turn ambition into a large-scale effect..

Scene 8 (10m 23s)

[Audio] References Sands Dalen, T., Grøndahl, V. A., Hov, R., Høye, S., Rystedt, I., & Wilde-Larsson, B. (2016). Patients’ perceptions of palliative care quality in hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care: a cross-sectional study. BMC palliative care, 15(1), 1-18. https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-016-0152-1 Dennis, M. K., Washington, K. T., & Koenig, T. L. (2014). Ethical dilemmas faced by hospice social workers. Social work in health care, 53(10), 950-968. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00981389.2014.950402 Preshaw, D. H., Brazil, K., McLaughlin, D., & Frolic, A. (2016). Ethical issues experienced by healthcare workers in nursing homes: literature review. Nursing ethics, 23(5), 490-506. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0969733015576357 Zadeh, R. S., Eshelman, P., Setla, J., Kennedy, L., Hon, E., & Basara, A. (2018). Environmental design for end-of-life care: An integrative review on improving the quality of life and managing symptoms for patients in institutional settings. Journal of pain and symptom management, 55(3), 1018-1034. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088539241730475X Rigby, J., & O'Connor, M. (2012). Retaining older staff members in care homes and hospices in England and Australia: the impact of environment. International journal of palliative nursing, 18(5), 235-239. https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/ijpn.2012.18.5.235.