Customizing Predictive Models for Severity Prediction. 

Scene 1

Customizing Predictive Models for Severity Prediction

Enhancing the Accuracy and Efficiency of Predictive Maintenance

A logo for a car

Description automatically generated

Introduction. Brief overview of the project: Predictive model to assess the severity of car issues Importance of customization Objectives of the presentation: Explain the need for customization Describe customization methods Demonstrate implementation steps. 

Scene 2

Brief overview of the project: Predictive model to assess the severity of car issues Importance of customization
 Objectives of the presentation: Explain the need for customization Describe customization methods Demonstrate implementation steps

[image] Person watching empty phone. Why Customize?. 

Scene 3

Customization is essential for:  Addressing specific user needs  Handling unique data characteristics  Enhancing model performance  Improving prediction accuracy
 Benefits:  Tailored solutions for better user experience  Optimal resource allocation based on severity predictions

Customizing Random Forests. Key parameters to customize: Number of trees: Increase to improve accuracy Tree depth: Control to prevent overfitting. 

Scene 4

Key parameters to customize: Number of trees: Increase to improve accuracy Tree depth: Control to prevent overfitting

Customizing Gradient Boosting Machines. Key parameters to customize: Learning rate: Lower values improve accuracy but require more trees Number of boosting stages: Increase to enhance performance. 

Scene 5

Key parameters to customize: Learning rate: Lower values improve accuracy but require more trees Number of boosting stages: Increase to enhance performance

Customizing LSTM for Text Data. Key parameters to customize: Number of layers: Increase to capture more complex patterns Number of units: More units can improve learning capability. 

Scene 6

Key parameters to customize: Number of layers: Increase to capture more complex patterns Number of units: More units can improve learning capability

Implementation Steps. [image] Top view of cubes connected with black lines. 

Scene 7

[image] Top view of cubes connected with black lines

1. Data Preprocessing: Clean and prepare data Feature engineering
 2. Model Customization: Select and tune parameters Train the customized model
 3. Model Evaluation: Validate with cross-validation Evaluate using appropriate metrics
 4. Deployment: Integrate into the production environment Monitor and update as needed

Conclusion. Customization is key to enhancing model performance and accuracy. By tailoring our predictive models, we can: Better address user needs Improve resource allocation Enhance overall user satisfaction. 

Scene 8

Customization is key to enhancing model performance and accuracy.
 By tailoring our predictive models, we can: Better address user needs Improve resource allocation Enhance overall user satisfaction

References. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451 Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171-4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423. 

Scene 9

Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451 Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171-4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423

Scene 0

 Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451 Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171-4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
