CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES. TYPES OF IMPLICATURE IMPLICATURE IN COMMUNICATION.
A. IMPLICATURE and TYPES OF IMPLICATURE. Implicature: Meaning beyond what is explicitly said Grice’s distinction: Natural meaning: Non-intentional (e.g., “Those clouds mean rain”) Nonnatural meaning: Intentional (e.g., “masticate” means “chew”) Types of implicature: Conversational (context-dependent) Conventional (context-independent).
TYPES OF IMPLICATURE. meaning natural meaning what is said nonnatural meaning what is implicated conventionally conversationally generalized particularized.
1. CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE (Hàm ngôn hội thoại).
1.1 GENERALIZED CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE (HÀM NGÔN HỘI THOẠI TỔNG QUÁT).
1.2 PARTICULARIZED CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE (HÀM NGÔN HỘI THOẠI CỤ THỂ).
1.2 PARTICULARIZED CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE (HÀM NGÔN HỘI THOẠI CỤ THỂ).
Generalized vs. Particularized. Example: “It’s going to rain tomorrow” Implicates: “The speaker believes it will rain and has reason to believe so” Is this a particularized implicature or generalized (declarative utterance)? The distinction between generalized and particularized implicatures can be blurry, depending on how one defines the class of utterances..
2. CONVENTIONAL IMPLICATURE (Hàm ngôn ước định). What is Conventional Implicature? Conventional implicature refers to a non-truth-conditional meaning associated with a particular linguistic expression. It is context-independent: the implicature arises regardless of the specific situational context..